<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: True Conversion and Return on Investment BS (ROIBS!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ppc-advice.com/2009/07/27/true-conversion-and-return-on-investment-bs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ppc-advice.com/2009/07/27/true-conversion-and-return-on-investment-bs/</link>
	<description>Online Marketing, Analytics, SEO, and Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:23:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPC-Advice.com Best Posts of 2009 &#124; PPC-Advice.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ppc-advice.com/2009/07/27/true-conversion-and-return-on-investment-bs/comment-page-1/#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>PPC-Advice.com Best Posts of 2009 &#124; PPC-Advice.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppc-advice.com/?p=337#comment-464</guid>
		<description>[...] True conversion and return on investment BS (ROIBS!) Maybe this was just my utter failure to coin an abbreviation of my own, or maybe I was totally off my rocker that day.  Who knows, it could be a bit of both?  Perhaps the message was a bit premature in that it addresses multi-touch campaign attribution and true ROI calculation.  Recent conferences seem to indicate the audiences are ready, so maybe it will get legs again in 2010. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] True conversion and return on investment BS (ROIBS!) Maybe this was just my utter failure to coin an abbreviation of my own, or maybe I was totally off my rocker that day.  Who knows, it could be a bit of both?  Perhaps the message was a bit premature in that it addresses multi-touch campaign attribution and true ROI calculation.  Recent conferences seem to indicate the audiences are ready, so maybe it will get legs again in 2010. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ppc-advice.com/2009/07/27/true-conversion-and-return-on-investment-bs/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppc-advice.com/?p=337#comment-147</guid>
		<description>I normally target 1-3% conversion rate anything under 1% needs to be improved, however it depends on the industry from what i have seen.  For example catalog sites normally have an extremely high conversion rate because people already know that they are going to buy before they go.  However, informational websites have a very low conversion rate because it is &#039;free information&#039; and a lot of the traffic that they receive is just that - people looking for free stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I normally target 1-3% conversion rate anything under 1% needs to be improved, however it depends on the industry from what i have seen.  For example catalog sites normally have an extremely high conversion rate because people already know that they are going to buy before they go.  However, informational websites have a very low conversion rate because it is &#8216;free information&#8217; and a lot of the traffic that they receive is just that &#8211; people looking for free stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ppc-advice.com/2009/07/27/true-conversion-and-return-on-investment-bs/comment-page-1/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppc-advice.com/?p=337#comment-700</guid>
		<description>I normally target 1-3% conversion rate anything under 1% needs to be improved, however it depends on the industry from what i have seen.  For example catalog sites normally have an extremely high conversion rate because people already know that they are going to buy before they go.  However, informational websites have a very low conversion rate because it is &#039;free information&#039; and a lot of the traffic that they receive is just that - people looking for free stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I normally target 1-3% conversion rate anything under 1% needs to be improved, however it depends on the industry from what i have seen.  For example catalog sites normally have an extremely high conversion rate because people already know that they are going to buy before they go.  However, informational websites have a very low conversion rate because it is &#8216;free information&#8217; and a lot of the traffic that they receive is just that &#8211; people looking for free stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

