<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exciting New Ideas at Google Adwords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ppc-advice.com/2007/09/12/exciting-new-ideas-at-google-adwords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ppc-advice.com/2007/09/12/exciting-new-ideas-at-google-adwords/</link>
	<description>Free Pay Per Click Advertising and Online Marketing Advice</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Garry</title>
		<link>http://www.ppc-advice.com/2007/09/12/exciting-new-ideas-at-google-adwords/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Garry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppc-advice.com/2007/09/12/exciting-new-ideas-at-google-adwords/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Hey Jeremy,

I agree, the content network is too mysterious.  It's unlikely Google will some day increase transparency for their own properties, but we can hope.

Garry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jeremy,</p>
<p>I agree, the content network is too mysterious.  It&#8217;s unlikely Google will some day increase transparency for their own properties, but we can hope.</p>
<p>Garry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy mayes</title>
		<link>http://www.ppc-advice.com/2007/09/12/exciting-new-ideas-at-google-adwords/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy mayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppc-advice.com/2007/09/12/exciting-new-ideas-at-google-adwords/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Hey Garry,

Thanks for the response. I wanted to swing back around and throw in my 2 cents on this;

"what feature request would you most look forward to seeing in Adwords?"

For me it's better targeting - specifically when it comes Google owned properties that serve truckloads of ad impressions...Gmail comes to the front of my mind. I would like to be able to target or exclude major sections of Google owned properties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Garry,</p>
<p>Thanks for the response. I wanted to swing back around and throw in my 2 cents on this;</p>
<p>&#8220;what feature request would you most look forward to seeing in Adwords?&#8221;</p>
<p>For me it&#8217;s better targeting - specifically when it comes Google owned properties that serve truckloads of ad impressions&#8230;Gmail comes to the front of my mind. I would like to be able to target or exclude major sections of Google owned properties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garry</title>
		<link>http://www.ppc-advice.com/2007/09/12/exciting-new-ideas-at-google-adwords/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Garry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppc-advice.com/2007/09/12/exciting-new-ideas-at-google-adwords/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeremy,

I know the beta for site targeted CPC has been out for a while, but from my understanding there was a lot of uncertainty as to whether it might be rolled out to all advertisers.  Whether that is true or not, I'm not sure, but I'm excited to finally get some of my newer customers online with it once it's publicly available.

I stand corrected on the demographic targeting front.  Thank you for the clarification.

Garry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeremy,</p>
<p>I know the beta for site targeted CPC has been out for a while, but from my understanding there was a lot of uncertainty as to whether it might be rolled out to all advertisers.  Whether that is true or not, I&#8217;m not sure, but I&#8217;m excited to finally get some of my newer customers online with it once it&#8217;s publicly available.</p>
<p>I stand corrected on the demographic targeting front.  Thank you for the clarification.</p>
<p>Garry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy mayes</title>
		<link>http://www.ppc-advice.com/2007/09/12/exciting-new-ideas-at-google-adwords/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy mayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppc-advice.com/2007/09/12/exciting-new-ideas-at-google-adwords/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Hey Garry,

Site targeted CPC has been around (in beta) for awhile now:

http://www.ppcdiscussions.com/2007/03/adwords-cpc-bidding-for-site-targeting.html

They have demographic targeting as well, although not on the search network. It's available via site targeting only. They pull the data from comScore:

https://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=33743

Blog on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Garry,</p>
<p>Site targeted CPC has been around (in beta) for awhile now:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ppcdiscussions.com/2007/03/adwords-cpc-bidding-for-site-targeting.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ppcdiscussions.com/2007/03/adwords-cpc-bidding-for-site-targeting.html</a></p>
<p>They have demographic targeting as well, although not on the search network. It&#8217;s available via site targeting only. They pull the data from comScore:</p>
<p><a href="https://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=33743" rel="nofollow">https://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=33743</a></p>
<p>Blog on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
